Affiliation:
1. Department of Biostatistics and Informatics , 144805 Colorado School of Public Health , Aurora , CO , United States
Abstract
Abstract
A powerful tool for the analysis of nonrandomized observational studies has been the potential outcomes model. Utilization of this framework allows analysts to estimate average treatment effects. This article considers the situation in which high-dimensional covariates are present and revisits the standard assumptions made in causal inference. We show that by employing a flexible Gaussian process framework, the assumption of strict overlap leads to very restrictive assumptions about the distribution of covariates, results for which can be characterized using classical results from Gaussian random measures as well as reproducing kernel Hilbert space theory. In addition, we propose a strategy for data-adaptive causal effect estimation that does not rely on the strict overlap assumption. These findings reveal under a focused framework the stringency that accompanies the use of the treatment positivity assumption in high-dimensional settings.
Subject
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Statistics and Probability
Reference44 articles.
1. van der Laan MJ, Gruber S. Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation. Int J Biostat. 2010;6(1).
2. van der Laan MJ, Rose S. Targeted learning: causal inference for observational and experimental data. Springer; 2011.
3. Athey S, Imbens G. Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113(27):7353–60.
4. Athey S, Imbens G, Wager S. Approximate residual balancing: De-biased inference of average treatment effects in high dimensions. 1604.07125 (2018).
5. Chernozhukov V, Chetverikov D, Demirer M, Duflo E, Hansen C, Newey W, Robins J. Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. Econom J. 2018. 10.1111/ectj.12097. Accepted Author Manuscript.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献