Utilizing Upper Arm Images in Determining Body Mass Index and Nutritional Status
-
Published:2019-08-10
Issue:4
Volume:9
Page:4392-4396
-
ISSN:1792-8036
-
Container-title:Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res.
Author:
Al-Mashaqbah S. F.,Al-Zyoud W.,Al-Zaben A.
Abstract
Body mass index (BMI) is the most widely used index for determining the fitness status of an individual. Midd-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is another commonly used anthropometric index, providing a simple measurement widely used for nutrition level screening. However, building a massive population database based on both BMI and MUAC measurements is time-consuming and may introduce errors due to instrumentations and different operators. In this paper, a measurement technique of BMI from photographic images of the upper arm is presented. Three parameters are measured from the subject photos with a scale attached, and these are upper arm length, sagittal plane middle arm thickness (SMT), and frontal plane middle thickness (FMT). Different parameters are derived from the SMT and the FMT. These parameters are used to study the correlation and measurements agreements with the BMI. It is found that all parameters related to SMT correlate very well with the BMI with correlation coefficients of more than 90%. In addition, the SMT measurement limits (both upper and lower) are acceptable and within the clinical significance range. Finally, the receiver operating characteristics analysis of both SMT and MUAC has been evaluated. The findings show that SMT is slightly better than MUAC since it gives excellent sensitivity (94.7%) without compromising the specificity (88.5%) when compared to the MUAC results.
Publisher
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
Reference21 articles.
1. M. M. Finucane, G. A. Stevens, M. J. Cowan, G. Danaei, J. K. Lin, C. J. Paciorek, G. M. Singh, H. R. Gutierrez, Y. Lu, A. N. Bahalim, F. Farzadfar, L. M. Riley, M. Ezzati, “National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: Systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants”, Lancet, Vol. 377, No. 9765, pp. 557-567, 2011 2. M. Marmot, T. Atinmo, T. Byers, J. Chen, T. Hirohata, A. Jackson, W. P. T. James, L. Kolonel, S. Kumanyika, C. Leitzmann, J. Mann, H. J. Powers, K. S. Reddy, E. Riboli, J. A. Rivera, A. Schatzkin, J. C. Seidell, D. E. G. Shuker, R. Uauy, W. C. Willett, S. H. Zeisel, Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective, American Institute for Cancer Research, 2007 3. D. P. Guh, W. Zhang, N. Bansback, Z. Amarsi, C. L. Birmingham, A. H. Anis, “The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: A systematic review and meta-analysis”, BMC Public Health, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2009 4. G. Whitlock, S. Lewington, P. Sherliker, R. Clarke, J. Emberson, J. Halsey, N. Qizilbash, R. Collins, R. Peto, “Body-mass index and cause specific mortality in 900,000 adults: Collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies”, Lancet, Vol. 373, No. 9669, pp. 1083-1096, 2009 5. F. Q. Nuttall, “Body mass index: Obesity, BMI, and health: A critical review”, Nutrition Today, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 117-128, 2015
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|