Interreligious Dialogue: the Actual Meaning, Typology and Features of the Post-Soviet Space

Author:

Lunkin R. N.1ORCID,Melnik S. V.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences

2. INION of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The article presents the authors’ thoughts on the reasons for the growing role of the religious factor in modern international relations, and the risks associated with the politicization of religions. It is concluded that religious diversity and at the same time the commonality of basic values directly correlate with the emerging multipolarity of the modern world. It is noted that against the backdrop of the crisis of the Western liberal order and neoliberal ideology, religion and its institutions have become symbols of new fundamentalism, that is, an ideology that calls for a return to the foundations of faith and one’s worldview and culture. The growing role of religion as an institution of civil society and the need to make this institution stronger, to integrate it into civil society and into the system of patriotic education are noted. A classification of types of interreligious dialogue (polemical, cognitive, peacemaking, partnership) and levels of interreligious dialogue (high, medium, low) is presented. The specifics of interreligious dialogue in the post-Soviet space and the features of post-Soviet religious and political identity, the new attitude of political authorities to the institutions of faith are determined: the desire to integrate them into the social structure of society and into social policy. A brief description of interreligious dialogue in the USSR and in the post-Soviet period is given. The prospects for the development of ethno-confessional relations in the post-Soviet space are considered. Recommendations are given for the development of interreligious dialogue at the present stage.

Publisher

ANO "National Research Institute for the Development of Communications"

Reference14 articles.

1. Komleva V.V. Religious institutions as regulators of the moral paradigm in geopolitics. Missiya konfessij [Mission of confessions]. 2017; 24:8-12 [In English]. EDN ZRQMBD.

2. Kondrakov Z. Strategies of interreligious dialogue. Vestnik Orenburgskoj duxovnoj seminarii [Bulletin of the Orenburg Theological Seminary]. 2022; 2(23):171-185 [In Russian]. EDN DICLST.

3. Lunkin R.N. Social inequality in modern risk society. Sovremennaya Evropa [Modern Europe]. 2023; 7(121):176-191 [In Russian]. DOI 10.31857/S0201708323070148. EDN RWWTHD.

4. Lunkin R.N. Religion and European populism: the Christian factor in political discussions. Sovremennaya Evropa [Modern Europe]. 2018; 1 (80):102-113 [In Russian].

5. Lunkin R.N. Socio-political consequences of the pandemic for the Russian Orthodox Church: unlocking the internal potential of civic engagement and social service. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby` narodov [Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia]. Series: Political science. 2020; 22 (4):547-558 [In Russian].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3