Friedrich Ratzel’s Law of the Spatial Growth of States in the Situation of the New World Order Formation

Author:

Barakhvostov P. A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Belarusian State Economic University

Abstract

In this paper, on the basis of an institutional approach, it is analyzed how fair the “law of expansion” of F. Ratzel is in the current situation of the formation of a new world order. It is shown that in modern conditions the instinct of self-preservation induces social systems not to territorial expansion due to an increase in the occupied geographical space, but to integration in various forms, which is based on a single normative approach to the mechanisms of the functioning of the union. In this sense, integration is a kind of expansion of the space occupied by society. Integration unions can increase, but up to a certain limit (saturation limit), determined not by the boundaries of geographical space, but by the possibility of developing a common position on the main issues of functioning, common norms and practices. As a rule, alliances are not absolutely symmetrical and include the “core” and the periphery of integration. The former include the most economically and politically strong states. At the same time, due to the asymmetry of the unions, the “core” institutions are transplanted to the periphery and there is a bidirectional institutional diffusion, which is due to the desire for institutional convergence, and this facilitates interaction within the union. Thus, “channels” for the institutional expansion of integrable societies are formed within the unions. Transplantation and diffusion of institutions are the mechanisms for the implementation of expansion in modern conditions. It is shown that when integrating social systems in order to mitigate possible institutional imbalances, the action of institutions that are complementary to the dominant ones in the institutional matrix is included: when integrating X-matrix countries - market ones, and vice versa.

Publisher

ANO "National Research Institute for the Development of Communications"

Reference46 articles.

1. Байков А.А. Сравнительная интеграция. Практика и модели интеграции в зарубежной Европе и Тихоокеанской Азии [Comparative integration. Experience and patterns of integration in the United Europe and Asia Pacific]. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2012.

2. Барановский В.Г. Политическая интеграция в Западной Европе. Некоторые вопросы теории и практики [Political integration in the Western Europe]. М.: Наука, 1983.

3. Барахвостов П.А. Институциональные особенности интеграции земель Речи Посполитой в состав Российской и Австрийской империй [Institutional Analysis of the Integration of Rzeczpospolita Lands in-to the Russian and Austrian Empires] // Вестник МГИМО-Университета. 2021. Т. 14. № 4. С. 51–69. DOI: 10.24833/2071–8160–2021–4–79–51–69.

4. Войтович С.А. Генезис и развитие научного понятия «интеграция» [Genesis and development of scientific concept of integration] // Курс международного права. Т. 7. Международно-правовые формы интеграционных процессов в современном мире. М.: Наука, 1993.

5. Дюркгейм Э. Социология. Ее предмет, метод, предназначение [Sociology. Its subject, method, purpose]. М.: Канон, 1995.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3