Comparison of T2-Weighted 3D-Space and T2-Weighted 2D-TSE Sequences in Lumbar Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Author:

Khan Quratulain,Nadeem Syed Farrukh,Mirza Tariq Mahmood,Shafiq Mazhar,Batool Zahida,Khadijah-tul-Kubra

Abstract

Background: Spine-related issues like low back pain have substantially increased in the past few decades across all age categories having various reasons. Objectives: To compare the image quality and diagnostic value of 3D space MRI sequence with 2D TSE MRI sequence in lumbar spine imaging. Methods: Fifty patients, irrespective of gender having age between 30-70 years, who presented with lower back pain were enrolled for the study. Lumbar spine imaging was done using 2D TSE and 3D space sequences and the subsequent images were evaluated by two senior consultant radiologists for qualitative analysis of visibility and pathologic indices of both sequences. Data was analyzed on SPSS 25.0. Statistical analysis was done using Cohen's kappa (k). Results: Female participants were 56% of total study population. Mean age of study participants found to be 53.62±10.76 years. Statistically significant difference (p-value =0.000) was noted for visibility score of all the lumbar spine components, when the 3D SPACE and 2D TSE images were compared with 3D-SPACE images found being superior in visibility. Inter- observer agreement for visibility of various regions of lumber spine was nearly perfect (k> 0.8) and substantial (0.6 to 0.8) for 3D-SPACE, while substantial (0.8<k> 0.6) for 2D-TSE. Pathologic indexes had a significant level of inter-observer agreement (k > 0.6). Inter-observer agreement for 3D sequence (k = 0.72) was greater than that for 2D-TSE sequence (k = 0.64). Conclusion: Images from 3D-SPACE sequences provide superior visibility over 2D-TSE and could be recommended as alternative imaging method for lumbar spine pathologies. Higher inter observer agreement illustrate that it may be included in routine sequences to make the better diagnosis for lumbar spine pathologies correctly.

Publisher

Annals of King Edward Medical University

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3