Affiliation:
1. P. G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University
Abstract
The paper is devoted to construction of a sentence corpus annotated by the general sentiment into 4 classes (positive, negative, neutral, and mixed), a corpus of phrasemes annotated by the sentiment into 3 classes (positive, negative, and neutral), and a corpus of sentences annotated by the presence or absence of irony. The annotation was done by volunteers within the project “Prepare texts for algorithms” on the portal “People of science”.
The existing knowledge on the domain regarding each task was the basis to develop guidelines for annotators. A technique of statistical analysis of the annotation result based on the distributions and agreement measures of the annotations performed by various annotators was also developed.
For the annotation of sentences by irony and phrasemes by the sentiment the agreement measures were rather high (the full agreement rate of 0.60--0.99), whereas for the annotation of sentences by the general sentiment the agreement was low (the full agreement rate of 0.40), presumably, due to the higher complexity of the task. It was also shown that the results of automatic algorithms of detecting the sentiment of sentences improved by 12–13 % when using a corpus for which all the annotators (from 3 till 5) had the agreement, in comparison with a corpus annotated by only one volunteer.
Publisher
P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Polymers and Plastics,Business and International Management
Reference19 articles.
1. V. Masoumi, M. Salehi, H. Veisi, G. Haddadian, V. Ranjbar, and M. Sahebdel, “TeleCrowd: A Crowdsourcing Approach to Create Informal to Formal Text Corpora.” 2020.
2. E. Mitiagina, M. Borodataya, E. Volchenkova, N. Ershova, M. Luchinina, and E. Kotelnikov, “Russian Text Corpus of Intimate Partner Violence: Annotation Through Crowdsourcing,” in 7th International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. EGOSE 2020, Springer, 2020, pp. 306–321.
3. S. Mohammad, “A practical guide to sentiment annotation: Challenges and solutions,” in Proceedings of the 7th workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity, sentiment and social media analysis, 2016, pp. 174–179.
4. S. M. Mohammad, P. Sobhani, and S. Kiritchenko, “Stance and Sentiment in Tweets,” Special Section of the ACM Transactions on Internet Technology on Argumentation in Social Media, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1–23, 2017.
5. B. R. Chakravarthi, V. Muralidaran, R. Priyadharshini, and J. P. McCrae, “Corpus Creation for Sentiment Analysis in Code-Mixed Tamil-English Text,” in Proceedings of the 1st Joint SLTU and CCURL Workshop (SLTU-CCURL 2020), 2020, pp. 202–210.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献