Affiliation:
1. Necmettin Erbakan University
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to test the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of glenohumeral joint (GHJ) position and movement sense tests of an isokinetic dynamometer in healthy individuals.
Methods: The study included 17 healthy subjects. GHJ position and movement sense tests were applied with an isokinetic dynamometer to the dominant extremity.
Results: The different error types calculated for position sense were in the range of mean 0.02±1.62 - 5.42±1.74. The ICC value for the different error types was determined in the range of 0.038 - 0.657 for the intra-rater tests, and 0.095 - 0.779 for the inter-rater tests. The movement sense test results for different directions and angles ranged from 9.61±2.61 to 11.18±2.89. The ICC values for movemeent sense were in the range of 0.687 – 0.912 for the intra-rater tests, and 0.844 - 0.925 for the inter-rater tests.
Conclusion: The isokinetic dynamometer showed moderate-good intra-rater and inter-rater test reliability in the measurement of the GHJ internal rotation movement sense. The intra-rater test reliability was poor in external rotation but the inter-rater test reliability was moderate-good. However in the measurement of movement sense, the isokinetic dynamometer showed intra-rater and inter-rater test reliability at an excellent level. The conformity of both the position and the movement sense tests, and therefore, the repeatability, was extremely good.
Publisher
Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
Subject
Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Reference27 articles.
1. Referans1. Hillier S, Immink M, Thewlis D. Assessing proprioception: a systematic review of possibilities. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(10):933-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968315573055
2. Referans2. Ager AL, Roy JS, Roos M, Belley AF, Cools A, Hébert LJ. Shoulder proprioception: how is it measured and is it reliable? A systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2017;30(2):221-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2017.05.003
3. Referans3. Tuthill JC, Azim E. Proprioception. Curr Biol. 2018;28(5):194-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.064
4. Referans4. Aman JE, Elangovan N, Yeh I, Konczak J. The effectiveness of proprioceptive training for improving motor function: a systematic review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;8:1075. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01075
5. Referans5. Cappellino F, Paolucci T, Zangrando F, Iosa M, Adriani E, Mancini P, et al. Neurocognitive rehabilitative approach effectiveness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon. A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012;48(1):17-30.