Validation of the Measures of the Transtheoretical Model for Exercise in an Adult African-American Sample

Author:

Blaney Cerissa L.1,Robbins Mark L.1,Paiva Andrea L.1,Redding Colleen A.1,Rossi Joseph S.1,Blissmer Bryan1,Burditt Caitlin1,Oatley Karin1

Affiliation:

1. Authors are with the Cancer Prevention Research Center, Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island.

Abstract

Purpose. African-Americans have high rates of physical inactivity-related morbidity and mortality, thus effective interventions to increase exercise are necessary. Tailored interventions show promise, but measures need validation in this population. This study validated transtheoretical model measures for exercise in an African-American sample. Design. Cross-sectional measure development. Setting. Telephone survey of individuals in North Carolina. Subjects. 521 African-American adults. Measures. Stages of change, decisional balance (pros and cons), self-efficacy and processes of change (POC) for regular exercise. Analysis. Confirmatory factor analyses tested measurement models. Multivariate analyses examined relationships between each construct and stages of change. Results. For decisional balance, the two-factor uncorrelated model was the most parsimonious good-fitting model (χ235 = 158.76; comparative fit index [CFI], .92; average absolute standardized residual [AASR], .04), and alphas were good (pros α = .85 and cons α = .74). The one-factor model for self-efficacy (α = .80) revealed an excellent fit (χ29 = 45.51; CFI, .96; AASR, .03). For the POC subscales with good alphas (α = .62–.91), a 10-factor fully correlated model fit best (χ2[360] = 786.75; CFI, .91; AASR, .04). Multivariate analyses by stage of change replicated expected patterns for the pros, self-efficacy, and POC measures with medium-sized effects (η2 = .05–.13). Results by stage of change did not replicate for the cons scale. Conclusions. The structures of these measures replicated with good internal and external validity, except for the cons scale, which requires additional development. Results support the use of these measures in tailored interventions to increase exercise among African-Americans.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health(social science)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3