The Effectiveness of Distance Interventions for Increasing Physical Activity: A Review

Author:

Jenkins Affrica1,Christensen Helen1,Walker Janine G.1,Dear Keith1

Affiliation:

1. Affrica Jenkins, BA Hons, BSc Hons; Helen Christensen, PhD; and Janine G Walker, PhD, are with the Centre for Mental Health Research, and Keith Dear, PhD, is with the National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

Abstract

Objective. Evaluate the effectiveness of distance physical activity interventions to establish intervention features that are key to success. Data Source. Computerized searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of distance physical activity interventions and visual scans of reference lists were performed between March 2004 and July 2006. Study Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. Studies were included if they (1) employed a randomized controlled design, (2) encouraged physical activity in adults, and (3) had no face-to-face contact between participants and researchers or health educators. Data Extraction. Twenty-two studies were found that met the inclusion criteria. Authors assessed the quality of the studies and coded articles according to key intervention features. Data Synthesis. This review is a systematic narrative review. Heterogeneity and poor study quality made formal meta-analysis inappropriate. Nevertheless, effect sizes were calculated for studies comparing intervention with control. Results. Overall, distance interventions increased physical activity in the short term (between-group effect size range, −.2 to .45). Print medium plus telephone contact was the most effective delivery mode. Conclusions. Poor study quality prevented firm conclusions. However, distance interventions were found to promote physical activity in the short term for some populations. This review provided limited support for the efficacy of distance exercise interventions and revealed limitations of the extant literature. Expansion of RCT research into distance approaches to promoting physical activity is warranted.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health(social science)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3