Author:
KHODZHAMURADOV G.M., ,ZIYOZODA S.S.,RIZOEV KH.KH.,ISMOILOV M.M.,SHARIPOVA M.B.,TOLIBOV A.KH., , , , ,
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the results of application of the two surgical techniques in the treatment of the consequences of urethral injuries (CUI). Methods: 38 patients aged 16.4±1.9 years with CUI were examined. CUI were localized in the area of the scaphoid fossa (n=3), the penile part (n=9), the bulbous region (n=6). Multi-site and panurethral lesions were noted in 8 and 12 cases, respectively. Additional research methods included ultrasound examination of the bladder, uroflowmetry, residual urine measurement, and, if necessary, retrograde and voiding urethrography. The patients underwent two types of surgical intervention: one-stage (16 patients, 1st group) and two-stage (22 patients, 2nd group) urethroplasty using a buccal mucosal flap. The results of surgery were assessed by ascending urethrography and uroflowmetry. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 24 months. Results: The immediate and long-term results between the two groups showed significant difference. According to uroflowmetry data, the main indicator of the effectiveness of surgical intervention was a stable retention of maximum urine flow rate at least 15 ml/sec. In the 1st group, there was one case of early wound dehiscence with the formation of a fistula. In the 2nd group, early divergence was observed in 8 cases, it was also accompanied by formation of fistulas. These complications required additional surgical intervention; their correction was deferred. Conclusion: One-stage urethroplasty using a buccal mucosal flap for CUI proved to be safer and more effective compared to the two-stage technique Keywords: Consequences of urethral injury, urethrography, uroflowmetry, buccal flap.
Publisher
Avicenna Tajik State Medical University
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference19 articles.
1. 1. Beloborodova VA, Vorobyov VA. Khirurgicheskaya rekonstruktsiya zadney chasti uretry [Surgical reconstruction of the back of the urethra]. Sibirskoe meditsinskoe obozrenie. 2017;3:13-20.
2. 2. Kotov SV. Striktury uretry u muzhchin - sovremennoe sostoyanie problemy [Urethral strictures in men - the current state of the problem]. Meditsinskiy vestnik Bashkortostana. 2015;10(3):266-70.
3. The prefabricated pedicled anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of a full-thickness defect of the urethra;Özkan Ö;Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery,2009
4. 4. Pushkar DYu, Zhivov AV, Loran OB, Karpovich AV, Bagaudinov MR, Ismailov MR. Sravnitel'naya chastota i faktory riska retsidiva striktury uretry pri razlichnykh metodakh operativnogo lecheniya [Comparative frequency and risk factors for recurrence of urethral stricture with various methods of surgical treatment]. Andrologiya i genital'naya khirurgiya. 2012;4:37-44.
5. 5. Palmer DA, Buckley JC, Zinman LN, Vanni AJ. Urethroplasty for high risk, long segment urethral strictures with ventral buccal mucosa graft and gracilis muscle flap. J Urol. 2015;193(3):902-5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. juro.2014.09.093