Abstract
Background: One of the main parts of air quality management is known as modeling of atmospheric pollutants. In this regards, simultaneous application of several models in a project and comparing the results obtained from these models could have been a considerable contribution to air quality managers for taking a more efficient decision. Methods: In this study, the stack of an industrial plant in the southwest of Isfahan was selected as the emission source and the total suspended particles emitted from this stack was simulated by applying AERMOD and ISCST3 view models (version 8.2). In this vein, the modeling process was conducted using MM5 meteorological data in a 50 50 km extent with 2000 m network distance for each of the models in 1-h, 24-h term averages (short term averages) and monthly and annual periods (long term averages) at ground level concentrations (GLC). Results: Results indicated that the highest simulated concentration for both models occurred in a 2000 meters’ distance in the east of the stack. Moreover, the highest simulated concentration applying AERMOD was lower than that of applying ISCST3 in all term averages which is due to existing differences between applied algorithms in these two models. Conclusion: Consequently, applying AERMOD due to the use of more advanced and up-to-date algorithms have priority over ISCST3 model. Applying ISCST3 can also be useful for small projects that require less input data compared to the AERMOD.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献