Investigation of the clinician satisfaction for the single-puncture and double-puncture arthrocentesis of temporomandibular joint-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Investigation of the clinician satisfaction for the single-puncture and double-puncture arthrocentesis of temporomandibular joint

Published:2024-01-26 Issue:1 Volume:13 Page:87-91
ISSN:1307-3540
Container-title:ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

SAMUR ERGÜVEN Sara¹^ORCID,AKSOY Selda²^ORCID,ŞENTÜRK M.fatih³^ORCID,OZKAN Aydın¹^ORCID,YÜCEL Çiğdem⁴^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Gülhane Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi AD.

2. Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Gülhane Tıp Fakültesi, Anatomi AD.

3. Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi AD.

4. Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Gülhane Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Tıbbi Biyokimya Kliniği

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinician satisfaction of single-puncture arthrocentesis and double-puncture arthrocentesis in cadavers. Material and Method: The study was conducted on 10 fresh cadaver temporomandibular joints bilaterally. Single-puncture arthrocentesis was randomly conducted on one side chosen by coin toss and double-puncture arthrocentesis on the other side. The main outcome variable was clinician satisfaction and measured using 0-10 point Likert scale. Results: Twenty arthrocentesis procedures were completed. The mean clinical satisfaction scores for single-puncture arthrocentesis and double-puncture arthrocentesis were 8.1 and 4.8, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between the techniques in terms of main outcome variable, and it was significantly lower in double-puncture arthrocentesis (p=0.001). Conclusion: Single-puncture arthrocentesis showed higher clinician satisfaction compared to double-puncture arthrocentesis.

Publisher

Ankara Dis Hekimleri Odasi

Reference27 articles.

1. Referans1. Nitzan DW, Dolwick MF, Martinez GA. Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: a simplified treatment for severe, limited mouth opening. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 49: 1163-67.

2. Referans2. Grossmann E, Poluha RL. Comparison between TMJ arthrocentesis techniques with different needle positions: A randomized single-blind controlled clinical trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2021; 49: 368-72.

3. Referans3. Grossmann E , Ferreira LA, Poluha RL, Setogutti E, Iwaki LCV, Iwaki Filho L. Comparison of two needles arthrocentesis versus double needle cannula arthrocentesis in the treatment of temporomandibular disc displacement. Cranio 2022; 40: 358-64.

4. Referans4. Şentürk MF, Yazıcı T, Gülşen U. Techniques and modifications for TMJ arthrocentesis: A literature review. Cranio. 2018; 36: 332- 40.

5. Referans5. Folle FS, Poluha RL, Setogutti ET, Grossmann E. Double puncture versus single puncture arthrocentesis for the management of unilateral temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction: A randomized controlled trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2018; 46: 2003-7.