Medical errors and patient safety: Strategies for reducing errors using artificial intelligence
-
Published:2023-01-15
Issue:S1
Volume:7
Page:3471-3487
-
ISSN:2550-696X
-
Container-title:International journal of health sciences
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Int. J. of Health Sci.
Author:
Baurasien Bander Khalid,Alareefi Hind Saad,Almutairi Diyanah Bander,Alanazi Maserah Mubrad,Alhasson Aseel Hasson,Alshahrani Ali D,Almansour Sulaiman Ahmed
Abstract
Background: Medical errors remain a significant challenge in healthcare, contributing to adverse patient outcomes, increased costs, and extended hospitalizations. These errors encompass diagnostic inaccuracies, medication mistakes, surgical errors, and communication breakdowns. The global prevalence of medical errors underscores the urgent need for effective strategies to enhance patient safety. Aim: This article explores the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in reducing medical errors and improving patient safety. It aims to evaluate how AI technologies can mitigate various types of medical errors, and the challenges associated with their implementation. Methods: The study reviews current literature on AI applications in healthcare, focusing on diagnostic support, medication safety, surgical precision, and patient monitoring. It analyzes the effectiveness of AI-driven systems in reducing errors across different medical disciplines and examines the integration challenges, including ethical and regulatory concerns. Results: AI technologies, including machine learning algorithms and decision support systems, have demonstrated significant potential in enhancing diagnostic accuracy, preventing medication errors, and improving surgical outcomes. AI-driven systems have shown promising results in real-time patient monitoring, early detection of adverse events, and optimizing healthcare management. However, challenges related to data privacy, algorithm transparency, and integration into clinical workflows persist.
Publisher
Universidad Tecnica de Manabi
Reference42 articles.
1. Brennan, T. A., Leape, L. L., Laird, N. M., Hebert, L., Localio, A. R., Lawthers, A. G., ... & Hiatt, H. H. (1991). Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. New England Journal of Medicine, 324(6), 370-376. 2. Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017). Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature, 542(7639), 115-118. 3. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.07874. 4. Hatib, F., Jian, Z., Buddi, S., Lee, C., Settels, J., Sibert, K., ... & Cannesson, M. (2018). Machine-learning algorithm to predict hypotension based on high-fidelity arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesthesiology, 129(4), 663-674. 5. Zhang, Q. (2018). Predictive big data analytics for precision medicine and healthcare delivery. J Healthcare Informatics Research, 2(2-3), 81-115.
|
|