Bacteriological and systemic immunity study of patients with urinary tract infection in Babylon province

Abstract

One hundred mid stream urine specimens and  blood sample and fifty healthy specimen[urine and blood ]as control for detection TLR-2 in serum have been collected From October to March 2021, urine specimen  from urinary tract infection patients in Hospital Hilla were cultivated for isolation and identification in Uropathogenic bacteria can be found in a variety of places. The automated VITEK-2 compact system was used to perform the final identification, which was based on colony positive identification. morphology, microscopic examination, and biochemical tests, while final identification was done with the automated VITEK-2 compact system using Gram positive-identification morphology, microscopic examination, and biochemical tests [GP-ID]and Gram negative-identification [GP-ID] [GN-ID]. The current study's findings revealed that samples grew bacteria, which were classified into Gram negative bacteria [51.48%] and Gram positive bacteria [51.48%]. [48.52 percent ]. E. coli was the culprit. 80 [21.5%] followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae40 [10.75%], and then Staphylococcus aureus 36[9.6%], 35[9.4%] for each Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Staphylococcus saprophytics 16[4.3%] while Enterococcus faecalis50[13.44%], while Enterococcus facium 40[10.75%] Streptococcus agalactiae 2[0.5%]and Enterobacter cloacae at a rate of 2[0.5%] and finally each of Morganella morganii 10[2.68%], Pseudomonas aeruginosa 40[10.75], Proteus mirabilis 20[5.3%].Candida albicans 46 .