The best paradigm for nursing research

Author:

Velázquez María del Rosario Herrera,Macías María Liliana Calderón,Alvia Aida Monserratec Macías,Estrella Alfredo Dencel Macías,Sequera David Marinely

Abstract

Reflects on the best approach of the paradigms in nursing research, which allows human phenomena to emerge and through them generate knowledge for this discipline. The systematic review was carried out of 25 documents, analyzing the hermeneutical positivist and interpretive approach to nursing research. According to the analyzed documents and in knowledge of the multiplicity and multidimensionality of phenomena related to the care of the human health experience, which is the object of study of nursing, one of these two paradigms could not be qualified as the best, since it would be foolish accepting one of them or thinking that one is better than another, even more so at the time science is currently going through. Paradigms will quantitative or positivist and qualitative or interpretive hermeneutic prevail to the extent that nursing science requires it.

Publisher

Universidad Tecnica de Manabi

Subject

Education,General Nursing

Reference25 articles.

1. Agrazal García, J. (2019). Research: essential element for the disciplinary development of nursing. Focus Magazine, XXIV(20), 35-46. http://up-rid.up.ac.pa/3252/1/1988

2. Burgo Bencomo, OB, León González, JL, Cáceres Mesa, ML, Pérez Maya, CJ, & Espinoza Freire, EE (2019). Some thoughts on research and educational intervention. Cuban Journal of Military Medicine, 48(2), 316-330. https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/revcubmedmil/cmm-2019/cmms191c.pdf

3. Castillo Lobos, L., & Pavez Lizarraga, A. (2021). The epistemological place of Nursing as art from an Aristotelian perspective. Culture of Caring, 25(60), 128-139. https://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/116421/1/CultCuid60_10.pdf

4. Chinn, P., & Kraemer, M. (1995). Theory and Nursing: A Systematic Approach (M.-Y. Book (ed.); 4th ed.).

5. Duran de Villalobos, M.M. (2018). Looking Outward: Projecting Nursing to 2050. Aquichan, 18(1), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.5294/here.2018.18.1.1. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/741/74155410001/74155410001.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3