The Relationship Between Thinking Styles and Learning Strategies of Students Studying in the Field of Music

Author:

Aycan Kıvanç1ORCID,Avcı Akbel Burcu2ORCID,İpekten Funda3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ

2. ANKARA YILDIRIM BEYAZIT ÜNİVERSİTESİ

3. ADIYAMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Abstract

This research aims to reveal the relationship between the thinking styles and strategies used while studying and learning instrumental music in the music departments of the faculty of fine arts and Turkish state music conservatories. The study utilized a correlational design among quantitative research designs and simple random sampling among sampling methods (n=137). The normal distribution of the data was evaluated using histograms, Q-Q plots, and the Shapiro-Wilk test. The correlation between quantitative data was assessed using Pearson correlation analysis. There was no significant difference between the mean values of the sub-dimensions of the scales used in this research and the class variable (p>0.05). In the study, a significant difference was found in favor of males between the gender variable and only the ‘executive’ sub-dimension of the learning styles scale (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the gender variable and the sub-dimensions of the scale of strategies used while studying and learning instrumental music. The results of this research indicate that students predominantly prefer comprehension monitoring strategies and least like articulation-organization and attention strategies used while studying and learning instrumental music. According to the average values of the study, it was revealed that the most common thinking styles of the participants were hierarchical, judicial, internal, and monarchic; they used liberal, external, anarchic, and oligarchic thinking styles at least, respectively. The data obtained from this research reveals that students do not use enough strategies while studying and learning instrumental music, regardless of their thinking styles. In this case, students should be informed about the use of learning strategies and encouraged to use them. For the teachers to make these referrals, they must be knowledgeable, equipped, and good observers. Pedagogical lessons can be added to the curriculum, including thinking styles and learning strategies, or course contents can be organized to include them.

Publisher

Journal of the Human and Social Sciences Researchers

Reference71 articles.

1. Afacan, Ş. (2018). Müzik eğitiminde öğrenme stratejileri üzerine yapılan ulusal literatürdeki çalışmaların incelenmesi [Investigation of studies in national literature on learning strategies in music education]. Researcher, 6(4), 395-406.

2. Akbulut, E. (2006). Pamukkale üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi müzik eğitimi anabilim dalı öğrencilerinin düşünme stil profilleri çerçevesinde değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of Pamukkale University Faculty of Education Department of Music Education students within the framework of thinking style profiles]. National Music Education Symposium, 26, 28.

3. Akçay, Ş. (2018). Müzik öğretmenlerinin düşünme stillerinin çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi [Examining the thinking styles of music teachers a-ccording to some variables]. The Journal of Social Science, 28, 184-199, doi:10.16990/SOBIDER.4459

4. Akçay, Ş. (2019). Mesleki müzik eğitimi alan öğrencilerin düşünme stilleri ile çeşitli değişkenler arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examining the relationship between the thinking styles and some demographical variables of the students receiving professional music education]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(2), 683-700. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.2687

5. Akın, Ö. (2007). Anadolu Güzel Sanatlar liseleri müzik bölümleri keman dersindeanlamlandırma stratejisinin kullanımı ve etkililik düzeyi [The use of elaboration strategy and ıts efficiency level in violin lessons given in music departments of anatolian fine arts high schools]. (PhD), Gazi University, Ankara. (207122)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3