Author:
Yousife Dhuha F.,Aldefae Asad H.,Zubaidi Salah L.,Aldelfee Alaa N.
Abstract
The essential factor that must get the interest by the engineers during the primary design stage of underground pipes is understanding mechanism of damage during earthquakes. The attention during design period increased due to the increment of seismic catastrophes throughout the few past decades. Therefore, finite element procedure was used for studying the seismic performance of buried pipes. PLAXIS-2D program was using for simulating the seismic performance of buried pipes using earthquake motion of single frequency. The response of both seismic vertical displacement, and acceleration of the buried pipe were simulated. The experiments of shaking table for two models of buried pipe in dry case that surrounded with sand and gravel were compared with numerical simulation results. According to the obtained results, the amplification of seismic wave raised considerably from the buried pipe base to the pipe crown, the biggest amplification occurred in the highest point of the pipe model. It can be noticed that Plaxis-2D software provides an accurate method for the prediction of seismic behaviour of buried pipe due to the obvious compatibility between the results of experiments and numerical simulation.
Reference36 articles.
1. Wang, D. (2010). Response of underground pipeline to random ground motion. Tianjin, China: Tianjin Univ. Tianjin.
2. O’rourke, T. D., & Jeon, S. S. (2000, November). Seismic zonation for lifelines and utilities. In Invited Keynote Paper on Lifelines. Proceedings sixth international conference on seismic zonation, Palm Springs, EERI CD ROM.
3. Campedel, M., Cozzani, V., Garcia‐Agreda, A., & Salzano, E. (2008). Extending the quantitative assessment of industrial risks to earthquake effects. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 28(5), 1231-1246.
4. Salzano, E., Iervolino, I., & Fabbrocino, G. (2003). Seismic risk of atmospheric storage tanks in the framework of quantitative risk analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 16(5), 403-409.
5. Lanzano, G., Salzano, E., de Magistris, F. S., & Fabbrocino, G. (2013). Seismic vulnerability of natural gas pipelines. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 117, 73-80