Affiliation:
1. I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Abstract
Relevance. Implant-supported prostheses are currently one of the most popular rehabilitation methods in partially or fully edentulous patients. Peri-implant soft tissue thickness is one of the principal determinants to achieve an aesthetic result and prevent the development of mucositis and peri-implantitis.Material and methods. The study included 30 partially edentulous patients with a lack of soft tissue thickness in the planned surgery site. 15 patients underwent augmentation using a collagen matrix (group 1) and 15 patients – with a free connective tissue graft (group 2). The primary endpoint was the assessment of soft tissue thickness gain three months after the surgery. The secondary endpoints were the thickness assessment of keratinized attached gingiva (three months after the surgery), swelling and pain severity (on the 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th day, 1 and 3 months after the surgery) and quality of life evaluation (OHIP-14) (before the surgery, seven days and three months after the surgery).Results. The soft tissues thickness gain was 1.181 ± 0.11 mm in group 1, 1.55 ± 0.11 mm – in group 2. The surgery took 8.4 minutes less (from 3.737 to 13.06) in group 1 than in group 2. The swelling assessment on the next day after surgery showed that the mean value was 2.73 ± 0.3 in group 1, 1.87 ± 0.74 – in group 2 (р = 0.0139). There were no statistically significant differences in the change in the width of the keratinized attached gingiva, pain syndrome and changes in patients' quality of life (p > 0.05)Conclusion. Collagen matrix, like a free connective tissue graft, is an effective way to increase the soft tissue thickness around dental implants.
Publisher
Periodontal Association - RPA
Reference16 articles.
1. Chackartchi T, Romanos GE, Sculean A. Soft tissue-related complications and management around dental implants. Periodontology 2000. 2019;81(1):124-138. doi: 10.1111/prd.12287
2. Tarasenko SV, Zagorskij SV. Review of Methodology and Materials Using for Building of Gum Soft Tissues. Journal of Clinical Practice. 2019;10(1):57-62 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/clinpract10157-62
3. Thoma DS, Gasser TJW, Jung RE, Hämmerle CHF. Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing implant sites augmented with a volume-stable collagen matrix or an autogenous connective tissue graft: 3-year data after insertion of reconstructions. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2020;47(5):630-639. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13271
4. Roccuzzo M, Grasso G, Dalmasso P. Keratinized mucosa around implants in partially edentulous posterior mandible: 10-year results of a prospective comparative study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2016;27:491-496. doi: 10.1111/clr.12563
5. Agrawal H, Kumar R, Kanteshwari IK, Jaiswal G, Marothiya S, Jasuja A, et al. Soft & Hard Tissue Assessment around Immediate & Delayed Implants: A Clinico-Radiographical Study. Mymensingh Medical Journal: MMJ. 2020;29(3):691-700. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32844813/
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献