Comparison of objective indicators of various properties of photocomposite materials with the subjective assessment of dentists-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of objective indicators of various properties of photocomposite materials with the subjective assessment of dentists

Published:2020-06-10 Issue:2 Volume:20 Page:95-100
ISSN:1683-3031
Container-title:Pediatric dentistry and dental profilaxis
language:
Short-container-title:jour

Author:

Skripkina G. I.¹^ORCID,Garifullina A. Zh.¹^ORCID,Breslavskaja E. A.¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Omsk State Medical University

Abstract

Relevance. Composite materials of light curing have a large number of indications for use and are actively used by dentists in clinical practice. The properties of these materials differ from their composition and the size of the filler. We conducted a survey of dentists of general practitioners of public and private dental clinics in Omsk to determine compliance, objective indicators of physico-chemical parameters of the studied composite materials and their subjective assessment by doctors using these materials in their work.Purpose. Comparison of objective indicators of various properties of photocomposite materials with the subjective assessment of dentists.Materials and methods. The study of the physicochemical properties of light-cured composite materials most commonly used in the practice of Omsk dentists in public and private clinics. A research design was developed and a survey of 148 dentists in Omsk was conducted to determine the subjective assessment of these materials.Results. A comparative analysis of the objective and subjective indicators of composite materials.Conclusions. The physicochemical parameters of the photocomposite materials are fully consistent with the subjective assessment of dentists in Omsk.

Publisher

Periodontal Association - RPA

Subject

Earth-Surface Processes

Reference17 articles.

1. K. V. Alejnikov, V. D. Vagner. Efficiency of dosing of composite materials for light curing with standard and modified methods. Stomatology for all. 2010;4:16-18. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/contents.asp?issueid=927266.

2. A. V. Vikulin, A. V. Markin. The results of the application of a flowable composite light-cure material «florist» to restore the gingival margin. Dental Forum. 2012;5:35. (In Russ.). http://www.stomadent.ru/articles/composit/flowrest/.

3. A. V. Vasilenko, A. V. Vikulin, T. I. Ibragimov, O. A. Stecjura. The use of a hybrid composite material of light curing for aesthetic restoration of the gingival edge. Dental Forum. 2016;4:18. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27300198&.

4. A. V. Gecman. The temporary incisors of the upper jaw. Stomatology of children's age and prevention. 2015;4(55):17-18. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25373522.

5. A. A. Blohina. Options for solving the actual problem of restoring cavities in the side teeth. DentArt. 2012;1:52-57. (In Russ.). https://stomport.ru/articles/varianty-resheniya-aktualnoyproblemy-vosstanovleniya-polostey-v-oblastizhevatelnoy-gruppy.