1. National Research Council. Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter, Vol. 3. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2001; pp 5-6.
2. DeWees, W.G.; Steinsberger, K.C. Test Report:Method Development and Evaluation of Draft Protocol for Measurement of Condensible Particulate Emissions; EPA 450/4-90-012; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1990.
3. Filadelfia, E.J.; McDannel, M.D. Evaluation of False Positive Interferences Associated with the Use of the EPA Method 202; In Proceedings of the 89th Annual Conference and Exhibition, Nashville, TN; A&WMA: Pittsburgh, PA, 1996.
4. Holder, T.E.; Goshaw, D.G.; Richards, J.R. Artifact Formation in Method 202 Sampling Trains Used to Measure Condensible Particulate Matter Emissions from Portland Cement Kilns; Paper 451; In Proceedings of the 94th Annual Conference & Exhibition, Orlando, FL; A&WMA: Pittsburgh, PA, 2001.
5. Wien, S.E.; England, G.C.; Loos, K.R.; Ritter, K. Investigation of Artifacts in Condensible Particulate Measurements for Stationary Combustion Sources; Paper 536; In Proceedings of the 94th Annual Conference and Exhibition, Orlando, FL; A&WMA: Pittsburgh, PA, 2001; Paper 536.