Analyzing “Inconsistencies” in Practice: Teachers' Continued Use of Round Robin Reading-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Analyzing “Inconsistencies” in Practice: Teachers' Continued Use of Round Robin Reading

Published:2008-12-29 Issue:1 Volume:25 Page:87-103
ISSN:1057-3569
Container-title:Reading & Writing Quarterly
language:en
Short-container-title:Reading & Writing Quarterly

Author:

Ash Gwynne Ellen¹,Kuhn Melanie R.²,Walpole Sharon³

Affiliation:

1. a Texas State University—San Marcos , San Marcos, Texas, USA

2. b Boston University , Boston, Massachusetts, USA

3. c University of Delaware , Newark, Delaware, USA

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Education

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10573560802491257

Reference34 articles.

1. If They Don't Read Much, How They Ever Gonna Get Good?

2. Teacher interruption behaviors during primary-grade oral reading.

3. Interdependence in the classroom: A field study.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Miseducation of Hispanic Children;Handbook of Research on Leading Higher Education Transformation With Social Justice, Equity, and Inclusion;2021

2. Rerouting Hearing Aid Systems for Overcoming Simulated Unilateral Hearing in Dynamic Listening Situations;Ear & Hearing;2019-10-03

3. Literacy and RTI on the Secondary Level;Advanced Strategies and Models for Integrating RTI in Secondary Schools;2019

4. Preservice Teacher Knowledge, Print Exposure, and Planning for Instruction;Reading Research Quarterly;2018-12-21

5. Reading Instruction for Students With Learning Disabilities in Grades 4 and 5: An Observation Study;Learning Disability Quarterly;2018-11-14