Abstract
There was a duel at dawn between A and B. A shot B, who lingered on until dusk of that day, and then died of his bulletwound. Certain background conditions are satisfied (it doesn't matter now what they are) which make it right to say not just that A caused B's death but that he killed him. So, A shot B and killed him. This seems to be structurally different from "A shot B and he kicked him," but what is this structural difference? How does the shooting relate to the killing?
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference1 articles.
1. The Time of a Killing;Judith;The Journal of Philosophy,1971
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Vagaries of References;Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy;2023-07-17
2. Acts and Embodiment;Metaphysics;2022
3. Indeterminate Identities, Supervaluationism, and Quantifiers;Analytic Philosophy;2020-08-24
4. Implications for Non-indexical Cases;Rationality, Time, and Self;2018
5. Doing and Causing;The Metaphysics of Action;2018