Abstract
Accounts of adaptive preferences are of two kinds: well-being accounts fully theorized for their own sake and political accounts theorized to facilitate the political project of reducing oppression and marginalization. Given their practical role, the latter are often less fully theorized, and are therefore less robust to theoretical criticism. In this paper, I first draw on well-being accounts to identify the well-theorized elements that political accounts should want to adopt in order to strengthen their project and avoid common criticisms. Second, I appeal to the political project to show the shortcomings of the well-being accounts on which I draw.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. autonomía y la discapacidad;Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética;2023-06-30
2. The Psychosocial Aspects of Adapting to Traumatic Non-life-threatening Disability;Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) in Canada;2023
3. Moral Intensifiers and the Efficiency of Communication;Symposium on Cocking and van den Hoven’s "Evil Online";2022-04-28
4. Adaptive preferences in political philosophy;Philosophy Compass;2021-12-17
5. Adaptive Preferences Are a Red Herring;Journal of the American Philosophical Association;2017