Abstract
Scott Soames has recently argued that traditional accounts of propositions as n-tuples or sets of objects and properties or functions from worlds to extensions cannot adequately explain how these abstract entities come to represent the world. Soames’ new cognitive theory solves this problem by taking propositions to be derived from agents representing the world to be a certain way. Agents represent the world to be a certain way, for example, when they engage in the cognitive act of predicating, or cognizing, an act that takes place during cognitive events, such as perceiving, believing, judging and asserting. On the cognitive theory, propositions just are act types involving the act of predicating and certain other mental operations. This theory, Soames argues, solves not only the problem of how propositions come to represent but also a number of other difficulties for traditional theories, including the problem of de se propositions and the problems of accounting for how agents are capable of grasping propositions and how they come to stand in the relation of expression to sentences. I argue here that Soames’ particular version of the cognitive theory makes two problematic assumptions about cognitive operations and the contents of proper names. I then briefly examine what can count as evidence for the nature of the constituents of the cognitive operation types that produce propositions and argue that the common nature of cognitive operations and what they operate on ought to be determined empirically in cross-disciplinary work. I conclude by offering a semantics for cognitive act types that accommodates one type of empirical evidence.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference32 articles.
1. Soames S. 2013d. “For Want of Cognitively Defined Propositions.” In To appear in Act Based Conceptions of Propositional Content: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, edited by Arapinis Moltmann , and Textor .
2. Against semantic multi-culturalism
3. The ‘Gray’s Elegy’ Argument, and The Prospects for the Theory of Denoting Concepts
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Cheap Propositions;Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology;2024
2. Act‐type theories of propositions;Philosophy Compass;2021-10-19
3. Cognitive propositions and semantic expressions;Intercultural Pragmatics;2021-06-01
4. Propositions as Structured Cognitive Event‐Types;Philosophy and Phenomenological Research;2020-04-19
5. SEEING THINGS;Philosophical Perspectives;2017-12