Abstract
Peircean Truth (PT) is the view that truth is in some sense epistemically constrained, constrained that is by what we would, if we inquired long enough and well enough, eventually come to believe. Contemporary Peirceans offer various different formulations of the view, which can make it difficult, particularly for critics, to see exactly how PT differs from popular alternatives such as correspondence theories or deflationism. This article, therefore, considers four possible formulations of PT, and sets out the different objections and challenges they each face and their relationships with one another. I focus upon the question of what, if anything, PT has to say about the property of truth.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A Deweyan Defense of Truth and Fallibilism;Contemporary Pragmatism;2024-04-17
2. Peirce’s Hypothesis of the Final Opinion;European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy;2018-12-31
3. On Endoxic Alethic Pluralism;Commonsense Pluralism about Truth;2017
4. Constituting assertion: a pragmatist critique of Horwich’s ‘Truth’;Synthese;2016-08-30
5. Intellectual Hope as Convenient Friction;Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society;2015