Abstract
According to Terence Penelhum, Philo's confession in the last part of Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion reveals on the side of the author a reconciliatory and pacifying attitude towards the liberal moderate clergy of his days. This article investigates whether another reading of this intriguing text is not more appropriate. It defends the idea that Philo's speeches and Cleanthes’ reactions to it in the last part of the Dialogues reveal on Hume's side an attitude of mild despair and isolation towards the religious culture of eighteenth-century Scotland, in both its orthodox and more moderate form.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Against Negative Readings of ‘True Religion’;Hume's Minimal Theism and the Supervised Christian Church;2024
2. Skepticism in Hume's Dialogues;Hume Studies;2022
3. Who speaks for Hume: Hume's presence in the 'Dialogues concerning Natural religion';Belgrade Philosophical Annual;2021
4. “True Religion” and Hume’s Practical Atheism;Sceptical Doubt and Disbelief in Modern European Thought;2020-10-20
5. Index;The Philosophical Progress of Hume's Essays;2019-02-28