Abstract
This paper explores the debate between perfectionists and anti-perfectionists in the context of children. It suggests that the most influential and compelling arguments in favour of anti-perfectionism are adult-centric. It does this by considering four leading reasons given in favour of anti-perfectionism and shows that none apply in the case of children. In so doing, the paper defends a perfectionist account of upbringing from the attacks made against perfectionism more generally. Furthermore, because the refutation of the various anti-perfectionist arguments are made exclusively dealing with children, the paper suggests that the perfectionist view of upbringing is compatible with anti-perfectionist restrictions on dealing with adults. This dual view combining perfectionism for children and anti-perfectionism for adults is referred to as restricted perfectionism.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Care for a Profit?;Perspectives on Politics;2022-04-11
2. Einführung;Die Erziehung der Vernünftigen;2022
3. The Moral Significance of Adolescence;Journal of Applied Philosophy;2021-11-06
4. Introduction;Educating the Reasonable;2021-10-29
5. Book review: John Tillson, Children, Religion and the Ethics of Influence;Theory and Research in Education;2020-07-20