Affiliation:
1. Pennsylvania State University State College Pennsylvania,
USA,
Abstract
War outcomes are unlikely to effect elections if the major parties did not disagree over the war. Leaders who enter into wars are more likely to be punished for defeat or rewarded for victory if the opposition did not support the government during the war. Employing original data on legislative opposition during interstate wars, this paper examines all elections since WWII in the United States, the United Kingdom, Israel, and India. The results confirm that leaders are far more likely to be punished (rewarded) for bad (good) outcomes if the opposition did not support the war. Further, there is no direct effect of either war outcomes or the position of the opposition. It is only when considered in conjunction with the opposition's behavior that the important link between war outcomes and elections is revealed.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Economics and Econometrics
Reference60 articles.
1. A Unified Theory of Party Competition
2. BBC News, Election Results through Time. 2005 . http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/vote2005/past_elections/html/default.stm
3. The Duration of Interstate Wars, 1816–1985
4. The Declining Advantages of Democracy
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献