Conceptualising domestic servitude as a violation of the human right to housing and reframing Australian policy responses-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Conceptualising domestic servitude as a violation of the human right to housing and reframing Australian policy responses

Published:2022-01-02 Issue:1 Volume:31 Page:98-122
ISSN:1038-3441
Container-title:Griffith Law Review
language:en
Short-container-title:Griffith Law Review

Author:

Hohmann Jessie¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Funder

Anti-Slavery Australia, University of Technology Sydney Faculty of Law

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Law

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10383441.2022.2060650

Reference108 articles.

1. Treaties and Conventions

2. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14, 4 November 1950, ETS 5 (entered into force 3 September 1953) (ECHR).

3. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 16 December 1966, 999 UNTS171 (entered into force 23 March 1976) (ICCPR).

4. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16 December 1966, 993 UNTS 3 (entered into force 3 January 1976) (ICESCR).

5. ILO Convention – Decent Work for Domestic Workers, 16 June 2011, PRNo 15A (entered into force 5 September 2013).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. ‘I’m All About My Child’: Supporting Modern Slavery Survivors as Parents;Journal of Human Trafficking;2023-12-06

2. Ending disability segregated employment: ‘modern slavery’ law and disabled people's human right to work;International Journal of Law in Context;2023-02-15