1. 2The action was based on s 1 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat 209, as amended, 15 USC s 1, and ss 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat 731, 737, as amended, 15 USC ss 15, 26.
2. Empagran SA v F Hoffmann-LaRoche, Ltd (2003) 315 F3d 338, CADC.
3. 515 USC s 1.