Community-Based Environment Protection, Citizen Participation, and the Albany Pine Bush Preserve-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Community-Based Environment Protection, Citizen Participation, and the Albany Pine Bush Preserve

Published:2002-05 Issue:5 Volume:15 Page:447-454
ISSN:0894-1920
Container-title:Society & Natural Resources
language:en
Short-container-title:Society & Natural Resources

Author:

Colvin Roddrick A.

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Environmental Science (miscellaneous),Development

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/08941920252866792

Reference8 articles.

1. Albany Pine Bush Preserve Commission. 1993. Management plan and final environmental impact statement for the Albany Pine Bush Preserve. Environmental Design and Research, P.C., Albany, NY.

2. Albany Pine Bush Preserve Commission. 1996. Albany Pine Bush protection and project review implementation guidelines. APBPC Technical Committee. Albany, NY.

3. Cohen, N. 1995. Technical assistance for citizen participation: A case study of New York City’s environmental planning process. Am. Rev. Public Admin. 25:119-135.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Retaining social and cultural sustainability in the Hudson river watershed of New York, USA, a place-based participatory action research study;Journal of Place Management and Development;2021-10-11

2. Greening the blue revolution of small-scale freshwater aquaculture in Mymensingh, Bangladesh;Aquaculture Research;2014-01-27

3. Socio-economic and ecological challenges of small-scale fishing and strategies for its sustainable management: A case study of the Old Brahmaputra River, Bangladesh;Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography;2013-03

4. ASSESSING THE PRINCIPLES OF COMMUNITY-BASED NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PLANS;Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management;2011-09

5. Household strategies in the face of resource scarcity in coastal Ghana: are they associated with development priorities?;Population Research and Policy Review;2006-10-05