The Use of Recommendations on Physician Rating Websites: The Number of Raters Makes the Difference When Adjusting Decisions-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

登录注册会员服务联系我们

The Use of Recommendations on Physician Rating Websites: The Number of Raters Makes the Difference When Adjusting Decisions

Published:2018-09-17 Issue:13 Volume:34 Page:1653-1662
ISSN:1041-0236
Container-title:Health Communication
language:en
Short-container-title:Health Communication

Author:

Carbonell Guillermo¹,Meshi Dar²,Brand Matthias¹³⁴

Affiliation:

1. General Psychology: Cognition, University of Duisburg-Essen

2. Department of Advertising and Public Relations, Michigan State University

3. General Psychology: Cognition, Center for Behavioral Addiction Research (CeBAR), University Duisburg-Essen

4. Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, UNESCO Weltkulturerbe Zollverein

Funder

German Research Foundation (DFG)

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Communication,Health (social science)

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10410236.2018.1517636

Reference30 articles.

1. Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences

2. Use of experts in complex decision making: A paradigm for the study of staff work

3. Smart People Ask for (My) Advice: Seeking Advice Boosts Perceptions of Competence

4. Choosing a Physician on Social Media: Comments and Ratings of Users are More Important than the Qualification of a Physician

5. Online physician ratings fail to predict actual performance on measures of quality, value, and peer review

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Beyond cyclopamine: Targeting Hedgehog signaling for cancer intervention;Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics;2024-04

2. Effect of Negative Online Reviews and Physician Responses on Health Consumers’ Choice: Experimental Study;Journal of Medical Internet Research;2024-03-12

3. Elements of information ecosystems stimulating the online consumer behavior: A mediating role of cognitive and affective trust;Telematics and Informatics;2023-05

4. The Influence of Paid Memberships on Physician Rating Websites With the Example of the German Portal Jameda: Descriptive Cross-sectional Study;Journal of Medical Internet Research;2023-04-04

5. Do Doctors Respond to Negative Ratings? Evidence from an Online Healthcare Platform in China;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号京ICP备18003416号-3