Status characteristics and their intersectionality: majority opinion assignment in state supreme courts-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Status characteristics and their intersectionality: majority opinion assignment in state supreme courts

Published:2019-02-06 Issue:5 Volume:8 Page:894-917
ISSN:2156-5503
Container-title:Politics, Groups, and Identities
language:en
Short-container-title:Politics, Groups, and Identities

Author:

Kaheny Erin B.¹,Szmer John²,Christensen Robert K.³^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA

2. Department of Political Science and Public Administration, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA

3. Romney Institute of Public Service and Ethics, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21565503.2019.1569538

Reference68 articles.

1. Modeling Certainty with Clustered Data: A Comparison of Methods

2. Do Policy Messengers Matter? Majority Opinion Writers as Policy Cues in Public Agreement with Supreme Court Decisions

3. A Common-Space Measure of State Supreme Court Ideology

4. Bonneau, Chris W., Paul Brace, and Kevin Arceneaux. 2005–2006. “Collaborative Research: An Individual-Level State Supreme Court Database.” doi:10.15139/S3/12080.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Who Shapes the Law? Gender and Racial Bias in Judicial Citations;American Political Science Review;2023-09-01

2. “I haven't come a long way, and I'm not a baby”: Task assignment and diversity of the Supreme Court bar;Social Science Quarterly;2021-11

3. Trailblazer women in the Supreme Court of Canada;Politics, Groups, and Identities;2021-07-01

4. Selecting Chief Justices by Peer Vote;State Politics & Policy Quarterly;2021-06