“Forward to David the Builder!” Georgia's (re)turn to language-centered nationalism

Author:

Berglund ChristoferORCID

Abstract

After the Rose Revolution, President Saakashvili tried to move away from the exclusionary nationalism of the past, which had poisoned relations between Georgians and their Armenian and Azerbaijani compatriots. His government instead sought to foster an inclusionary nationalism, wherein belonging was contingent upon speaking the state language and all Georgian speakers, irrespective of origin, were to be equals. This article examines this nation-building project from a top-down and bottom-up lens. I first argue that state officials took rigorous steps to signal that Georgian-speaking minorities were part of the national fabric, but failed to abolish religious and historical barriers to their inclusion. I next utilize a large-scale, matched-guise experiment (n= 792) to explore if adolescent Georgians ostracize Georgian-speaking minorities or embrace them as their peers. I find that the upcoming generation of Georgians harbor attitudes in line with Saakashvili's language-centered nationalism, and that current Georgian nationalism therefore is more inclusionary than previous research, or Georgia's tumultuous past, would lead us to believe.

Funder

Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education

Borbos Erik Hansson Stiftelse

Sixten Gemzéus Stiftelse

Byzantiska Resestipendiet

Forskraftstiftelsen Theodor Adelswärds Minne

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,History,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference109 articles.

1. Shane Scott . 1991. “Nationalist Leader in Soviet Georgia Turns Georgians against Minorities.” The Baltimore Sun, March 7.

2. Sepashvili Giorgi . 2003. “Brethren in Christ, Divided.” Civil Georgia, September 29.

3. Saakashvili's stance drew criticism from the Council of Europe (2009, 16). But his unwillingness to differentiate citizens by their ethnicity is similar to the French reluctance against making “distinctions between citizens on grounds of origin or religion” (Civil Georgia, 22 December 2008; Thio 2005, 241).

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3