Author:
Ambrosio Thomas,Lange William A.
Abstract
Following the August War of 2008, Russia recognized South Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent states. Both territories remain dependent upon Moscow for their security and economic survival, and they remain dominated militarily, economically, and even politically by their northern patron. These relationships are structured, in part, by a series of bilateral agreements signed since September 2008, which have created a comprehensive legal architecture which, in turn, deeply affects the state- and nation-building processes in South Ossetia and Abkhazia. This article examines 78 agreements signed between Russia and these territories between 2008 and 2015 in order to better understand these processes and how they interact with and are influenced by their respective relationships with the Russian Federation. It groups these agreements into three categories: the 2008 “friendship” agreements which created the initial baseline for the bilateral relationship; the numerous, more narrowly defined documents which fleshed-out this relationship; and the “alliance” and “integration” agreements signed with Abkhazia and South Ossetia, respectively, through which Moscow sought to take its relations with these territories to a qualitatively new level. Of particular focus is the degree to which these territories exhibited signs of independent agency and formal autonomy, as well as the differences between them.
Funder
Upper Midwest Regional Center on Public Policy, North Dakota State University
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,History,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference71 articles.
1. The Rise and Fall of Power-Sharing Treaties between Center and Regions in Post-Soviet Russia;Chuman;Demokratizatsiya,2011
2. For example, South Ossetia is landlocked; so obviously there is no South Ossetia equivalent to the agreements with Abkhazia on maritime transport (ABK-2010-14), fisheries (ABK-2010-15), and rescue in the Black Sea (ABK-2010-05). Moreover, South Ossetia lacks both an airport and workable rail lines, and therefore agreements on these issues were with Abkhazia only (ABK-2010-077, ABK-2010-09, ABK-2010-16, ABK-2011-02, and ABK-2011-06).
3. Nationalism Reframed
4. Convincing State-Builders? Disaggregating Internal Legitimacy in Abkhazia
5. Conflict resolution after the 2008 Georgia–Russia War: the Taiwan and Kosovo models as tools for mobilization and comparison
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献