Gene editing achieves consistently higher favorability in social and traditional media than GMOs-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Gene editing achieves consistently higher favorability in social and traditional media than GMOs

Published:2023-06-21 Issue:1 Volume:14 Page:1-8
ISSN:2164-5698
Container-title:GM Crops & Food
language:en
Short-container-title:GM Crops & Food

Author:

Lynas Mark¹^ORCID,Adams Selene²,Stockert Karen²

Affiliation:

1. The Alliance for Science, The Boyce Thompson Institute, Ithaca, New York, USA

2. Cision Global Insights, Chicago, IL, USA

Funder

no funding associated with the work featured

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Agronomy and Crop Science,Food Science,Biotechnology

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21645698.2023.2226889

Reference10 articles.

1. The state of the ‘GMO’ debate - toward an increasingly favorable and less polarized media conversation on ag-biotech?

2. Pew Research Center. Public and scientists’ views on science and society. 2015; https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/

3. https://www.jmir.org/2020/8/e17830/

4. Science, God, and Nature: A Textual and Frequency Analysis of Facebook Comments on News Articles About Agricultural and Environmental Gene Editing

5. Before and after the Chinese gene-edited human babies: Multiple discourses of gene editing on social media

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Applications, Benefits, and Challenges of Genome Edited Crops;Council for Agricultural Science and Technology;2024

2. The impact of ‘framing’ in the adoption of GM crops;GM Crops & Food;2023-12-15

3. The evolving landscape of global regulations on genome-edited crops;Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology;2023-11-23