Should conventional terrorist bombings be considered weapons of mass destruction terrorism?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Should conventional terrorist bombings be considered weapons of mass destruction terrorism?

Published:2017-01-02 Issue:1 Volume:10 Page:54-73
ISSN:1746-7586
Container-title:Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict
language:en
Short-container-title:Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict

Author:

Early Bryan R.¹,Martin Erika G.²³,Nussbaum Brian⁴,Deloughery Kathleen⁵

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Science, Project on International Security, Conflict, and Economic Statecraft (PISCES), University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, USA

2. Department of Public Administration & Policy, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, USA

3. Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, SUNY, Albany, USA

4. College of Emergency Preparedness, Homeland Security, and Cyber Security, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, USA

5. Department of Public Administration, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, USA

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,Cultural Studies,Social Psychology

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17467586.2017.1349327

Reference34 articles.

1. Connections Can Be Toxic: Terrorist Organizational Factors and the Pursuit of CBRN Weapons

2. Be Prepared — The Boston Marathon and Mass-Casualty Events

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Weapons of Mass Destruction—Conceptual and Ethical Issues with Regard to terrorism;Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications;2021

2. Distributing Local Resources for Public Health Preparedness Grants: A Data-Driven Approach;Journal of Public Health Management and Practice;2020-02-18