Guardian versus warrior cops: predicting officers’ support for procedural justice and coercive policing-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Guardian versus warrior cops: predicting officers’ support for procedural justice and coercive policing

Published:2024-05-27 Issue: Volume: Page:1-20
ISSN:1043-9463
Container-title:Policing and Society
language:en
Short-container-title:Policing and Society

Author:

Murphy Kristina¹^ORCID,McCarthy Molly¹²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Griffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia

2. Alfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia

Funder

Australian Research Council

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10439463.2024.2357653

Reference60 articles.

1. Counter-terrorism measures and perceptions of police legitimacy: the importance Muslims place on procedural justice, representative bureaucracy, and bounded-authority concerns;Ali M.;Journal of criminology,2022

2. Balko, R., 2013. Rise of the warrior cop: the militarisation of America’s police forces. New York: Public Affairs.

3. Bayley, D., 1996. Police brutality abroad. In: W. Geller, and H. Toch, eds. Police violence: understanding and controlling police abuse of force. New Haven: Yale University Press, 273–291.

4. The ‘us vs them’ mentality: a comparison of police cadets at different stages of their training;Boivin R.;Police practice and research,2020

5. Beyond procedural justice: a dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice;Bottoms A.;Journal of criminal Law & criminology,2012

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Are police as “guardian-oriented” as they should be? Expectation-reality discrepancies are related to perceptions of legitimacy;Journal of Criminal Justice;2024-09