1. Berkman , N. D. , DeWalt , D. A. , Pignone , M. P. , Sheridan , S. L. , Lohr , K. N. , et al. ( 2004 ). Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 87. Retrieved July 19, 2008, fromhttp://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/litsum.pdf
2. Berkman , N. D. , Sheridan , S. L. , Donahue , K. E. , Halpern , D. J. , Viera , A. , et al. ( 2011 ).Health literacy interventions and outcomes: An update of the literacy and health outcomes systematic review of the literature(Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, Number 199. Prepared by RTI International-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290–2007-10056-I. AHRQ Publication Number 11-E006). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
3. Using computer agents to explain medical documents to patients with low health literacy
4. Multimedia Version of a Standard Medical Questionnaire Improves Patient Understanding Across All Literacy Levels
5. The effect of format modifications and reading comprehension on recall of informed consent information by low-income parents: a comparison of print, video, and computer-based presentations