Study of the Quality of Information Given to Patients Participating in a Clinical Trial Regarding Chronic Hemodialysis-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Study of the Quality of Information Given to Patients Participating in a Clinical Trial Regarding Chronic Hemodialysis

Published:2004-01-01 Issue:6 Volume:38 Page:517-520
ISSN:0036-5599
Container-title:Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology
language:en
Short-container-title:Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology

Author:

Lynöe Niels¹²,Näsström Birgit²,Sandlund Mikael³

Affiliation:

1. Dept of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

2. Departments of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Northern University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden

3. Departments of Clinical Science/Psychiatry, Northern University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Urology,Nephrology

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00365590410033362

Reference10 articles.

1. Randomised comparison of procedures for obtaining informed consent in clinical trials of treatment for cancer.

2. Lyn& N, Sandlund M, Dahlquist G, Jacobsson L. Informed consent: study of quality of information given to participants in a clinical trial. Br Med J 1991; 303: 610–3.

3. A survey of the opinions on'informed consent'of women currently involved in clinical trials within a breast unit

4. Lyn& N, Jacobsson L, Sandlund M. When others decide: reasons for allowing Alzheimer patients to participate in non-therapeutic research. Int Psychogeriatrics 1998; 10: 435–6.

5. Lyn& N, Sandlund M, Jacobsson L. Informed consent in two Swedish prisons: study of quality of information and reasons to participate in a clinical trial. Med Law 2001; 20: 515–23.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Analysis of informed consent documents for compliance with ICMR guidelines for biomedical and health research;Perspectives in Clinical Research;2024-04-08

2. Participants’ understanding of informed consent in clinical trials: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis;PLOS ONE;2024-01-02

3. Patient perceptions of the challenges of recruitment to a renal randomised trial registry: a pilot questionnaire-based study;Trials;2021-09-06

4. An evaluation of the process of informed consent: views from research participants and staff;Trials;2021-08-18

5. Participants’ understanding of informed consent in clinical trials over three decades: systematic review and meta-analysis;Bulletin of the World Health Organization;2015-01-22