1. Benn on privacy and respect for persons
2. While I do not maintain that an amoralist standpoint is logically inconsistent with recognising the existence ofnaturalpersons besides oneself, I do claim that the conceptualisation of our place in the world and the kind of purposes and values which we generally have are such that to be a consistent amoralist would involve a kind of conceptual sacrifice, a conceptual revision so extensive, that it is hardly likely that anyone could successfully accomplish it. Nor can I see why they should try. I have argued this more fully in Freedom, autonomy, and the concept of a personProceedings of the Aristotelian Society1976 LXXVI