Clinical dilemmas of routine outcome monitoring and clinical feedback: A qualitative study of patient experiences-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

登录注册会员服务联系我们

Clinical dilemmas of routine outcome monitoring and clinical feedback: A qualitative study of patient experiences

Published:2020-07-08 Issue:2 Volume:31 Page:200-210
ISSN:1050-3307
Container-title:Psychotherapy Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Psychotherapy Research

Author:

Solstad Stig Magne¹,Kleiven Gøril Solberg¹^ORCID,Castonguay Louis Georges²,Moltu Christian¹³

Affiliation:

1. District General Hospital of Førde, Sunnfjord, Norway

2. Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

3. Department of Health and Caring Science, Western Norway University of Applied Science, Sunnfjord, Norway

Funder

Helse Vest

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Clinical Psychology

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10503307.2020.1788741

Reference45 articles.

1. Building a Rigorous and Relevant Knowledge Base for the Psychological Therapies

2. It's not that bad: the views of consumers and carers about routine outcome measurement in mental health

3. Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: Benefits, challenges, and solutions

4. Introducing the routine use of outcomes measurement to mental health services

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Talking About Things Important to Me: Mental Health Consumers' Experiences of Consumer‐Rated Measures;International Journal of Mental Health Nursing;2024-08-20

2. Personalized and collaborative care are crucial elements for sustained engagement with digital measurement-based care tools: A mixed-methods study;2024-05-14

3. Using Progress Feedback to Enhance Treatment Outcomes: A Narrative Review;Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research;2024-05-11

4. The case against routine outcome monitoring;Clinical Psychologist;2024-05-03

5. Routine Outcome Monitoring from Psychotherapists’ Perspectives: A Framework Analysis Study of Expected Benefits and Difficulties;Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research;2024-02-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号京ICP备18003416号-3