Comparing Cut Scores from the Angoff Method and Two Variations of the Hofstee and Beuk Methods-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparing Cut Scores from the Angoff Method and Two Variations of the Hofstee and Beuk Methods

Published:2020-03-03 Issue:2 Volume:33 Page:159-173
ISSN:0895-7347
Container-title:Applied Measurement in Education
language:en
Short-container-title:Applied Measurement in Education

Author:

Wyse Adam E.¹

Affiliation:

1. Psychometrics Department, Renaissance

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/08957347.2020.1732385

Reference29 articles.

1. Bowers, J. J. & Shindoll, R. R. (1989). A comparison of the Angoff, Beuk, and Hofstee methods for a setting a passing score. ACT Research Report Series (89-2). Iowa City, IA: ACT.

2. Conclusions About Frequently Studied Modified Angoff Standard-Setting Topics

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pilot study to evaluate a training programme for primary care physiotherapists in the assessment and management of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo;The Journal of Laryngology & Otology;2024-05-23

2. Comparing Estimated and Real Item Difficulty Using Multi-Facet Rasch Analysis;Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi;2023-12-31

3. Teaching Medical Statistics Within the Context of Evidence Based Medicine;Teaching Biostatistics in Medicine and Allied Health Sciences;2023

4. Equal Z standard-setting method to estimate the minimum number of panelists for a medical school’s objective structured clinical examination in Taiwan: a simulation study;Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions;2022-10-17

5. Standard-Setting for Continuing Education Assessment of Select New Competencies;Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions;2021-10-01