NRP Possibly Violates “Do No Harm” and Is Not Worth Risking the Perception That It Does-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

NRP Possibly Violates “Do No Harm” and Is Not Worth Risking the Perception That It Does

Published:2024-06-02 Issue:6 Volume:24 Page:54-56
ISSN:1526-5161
Container-title:The American Journal of Bioethics
language:en
Short-container-title:The American Journal of Bioethics

Author:

Flescher Andrew¹^ORCID,Kulkarni Sanjay²,Ladin Keren³^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Stony Brook University

2. Yale School of Medicine

3. Tufts University

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15265161.2024.2336803

Reference8 articles.

1. Annenberg Public Policy Center University of Pennsylvania. Confidence declines in CDC and Dr. Anthony Fauci. January 27 2022. https://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/confidence-declines-in-cdc-and-dr-anthony-fauci/

2. Clamping of the Aortic Arch Vessels During Normothermic Regional Perfusion After Circulatory Death Prevents the Return of Brain Activity in a Porcine Model

3. Maintaining the permanence principle for death during in situ normothermic regional perfusion for donation after circulatory death organ recovery: A United Kingdom and Canadian proposal

4. Miller, F. G., and R. D. Truog. 2012. Death, dying, and organ donation: Reconstructing medical ethics at the end of life, 173–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

5. Ethical and logistical concerns for establishing NRP‐cDCD heart transplantation in the United States

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Reestablishing Circulation in Donors: To What Degree Does It Matter?;The American Journal of Bioethics;2024-07-18