International Partnerships to Develop Evidence-informed Priority Setting Institutions: Ten Years of Experience from the International Decision Support Initiative (iDSI)-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

International Partnerships to Develop Evidence-informed Priority Setting Institutions: Ten Years of Experience from the International Decision Support Initiative (iDSI)

Published:2023-12-31 Issue:3 Volume:9 Page:
ISSN:2328-8604
Container-title:Health Systems & Reform
language:en
Short-container-title:Health Systems & Reform

Author:

Baker Peter¹,Barasa Edwine²,Chalkidou Kalipso³,Chola Lumbwe⁴,Culyer Anthony⁵^ORCID,Dabak Saudamini⁶,Fan Victoria Y.¹,Frønsdal Katrine⁴,Heupink Lieke Fleur⁴,Isaranuwatchai Wanrudee⁶⁷^ORCID,Mbau Rahab²,Mehndiratta Abha¹,Nonvignon Justice⁸,Ruiz Francis⁹,Teerawattananon Yot⁶¹⁰^ORCID,Vassall Anna⁹,Guzman Javier¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Global Health Policy, Center for Global Development, Washington DC, USA

2. Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya

3. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland

4. Global Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway

5. Department of Economics and Related Studies and Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK

6. Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand

7. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

8. Health Economics Programme, Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

9. Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

10. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

Funder

the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23288604.2024.2330112

Reference49 articles.

1. Glassman A, Chalkidou K. 2012. Priority-setting in health: building institutions for smarter public spending. Washington DC: Center for Global Development.

2. What is the value of explicit priority setting for health interventions? A simulation study

3. World Health Organization. Health intervention and technology assessment in support of universal health coverage. Geneva: The Sixty-seventh World Health Assembly; 2014.

4. The new definition of health technology assessment: A milestone in international collaboration

5. Accountability for reasonableness

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How should the new government rebuild the UK’s reputation in global health?;BMJ;2024-07-12

2. Measuring progress in institutionalising evidence-informed priority-setting in the Indian healthcare system: an application using the iProSE scale;BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine;2024-03-08

3. Introduction to the Special Issue on “Building Institutions for Priority Setting in Health”;Health Systems & Reform;2023-12-31