Developmental trends in children’s feeling-of-knowing judgements

Author:

Lockl Kathrin,Schneider Wolfgang1

Affiliation:

1. University of Würzburg, Germany

Abstract

The main goal of this study was to examine developmental trends in the accuracy of feeling-ofknowing (FOK) judgements given that previous work in this issue had yielded inconsistent results. Although most research conducted with preschoolers and young school children has reported increasing accuracy with increasing age, a methodologically improved study (Butterfield, Nelson, & Peck, 1988) did not confirm such a trend. The present study was based on such an improved design but included different age groups (7-, 8-, 9-, and 10-year-olds). A second goal was to explore the basis of FOK judgements, by comparing the traditional “trace-based” view with the “trace accessibility” model developed by Koriat (1993). Whereas the former assumes a two-stage process of monitoring and retrieval, the latter proposes that FOK judgements are based on retrieval attempts and determined by the amount of information that can be spontaneously generated, regardless of its correctness. As a main result, no developmental trends in the accuracy of FOK judgements were found. FOK accuracy was generally low but above chance for all age groups. Furthermore, the findings support the “trace accessibility” model in that dissociations between feeling of knowing and knowing could be demonstrated. That is, although FOK judgements regarding subsequent item recognition were generally high whenever an answer could be generated and much lower when no answer was generated at free retrieval, regardless of its correctness, recognition performance was comparatively low for previous nonretrieved and incorrectly remembered items and close to ceiling for correctly remembered items.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology,Life-span and Life-course Studies,Developmental Neuroscience,Social Psychology,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Education

Cited by 60 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3