New public management marketizers versus Neo-Weberian state modernizers? Institutional configurations of social impact bond utilization among 18 OECD countries-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

New public management marketizers versus Neo-Weberian state modernizers? Institutional configurations of social impact bond utilization among 18 OECD countries

Published:2024-07-04 Issue: Volume: Page:1-27
ISSN:1471-9037
Container-title:Public Management Review
language:en
Short-container-title:Public Management Review

Author:

Hajer Jesse¹,Chen Bin²

Affiliation:

1. Department of Economics and Labour Studies Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

2. Marxe School of Public and International Affairs, Baruch College & The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New york, USA

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14719037.2024.2369789

Reference91 articles.

1. Albertson, Kevin, Chris Fox, O’Leary Chris, and Gary Painter. 2018. Payment by Results and Social Impact Bonds: Outcome-Based Payment Systems in the UK and US. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

2. Towards a Theoretical Framework for Social Impact Bonds

3. Expanding the Concept of Social Impact Bonds

4. Configurations of New Public Management reforms and the efficiency, effectiveness and equity of public healthcare systems: a fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis

5. Anheier, Helmut K, and Lester M Salamon. 2006. “The Nonprofit Sector in Comparative Perspective.” In The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, edited by Walter W. Powell and Richard Steinberg, 89–114. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. NPM reconsidered: towards the study of enduring forms of NPM;Public Management Review;2024-07-17