Meningioma systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an assessment of reporting and methodological quality-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Meningioma systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an assessment of reporting and methodological quality

Published:2022-10-20 Issue:6 Volume:36 Page:678-685
ISSN:0268-8697
Container-title:British Journal of Neurosurgery
language:en
Short-container-title:British Journal of Neurosurgery

Author:

George Alan M.¹^ORCID,Gupta Shubhi¹^ORCID,Keshwara Sumirat M.¹^ORCID,Mustafa Mohammad A.¹^ORCID,Gillespie Conor S.¹^ORCID,Richardson George E.¹^ORCID,Steele Amy C.²^ORCID,Zamanipoor Najafabadi Amir H.³^ORCID,Dirven Linda⁴^ORCID,Marson Anthony G.⁵⁶^ORCID,Islim Abdurrahman I.¹⁶^ORCID,Jenkinson Michael D.¹⁶^ORCID,Millward Christopher P.¹⁶^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK

2. School of Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

3. University Neurosurgical Center Holland, Leiden University Medical Centre, Haaglanden Medical Center, Haga Teaching Hospitals, Leiden, The Netherlands

4. Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

5. Department of Neurology, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK

6. Institute of Systems, Molecular, & Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Neurology (clinical),General Medicine,Surgery

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688697.2022.2115008

Reference21 articles.

1. Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature

2. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both