How U.S. research institutions are responding to the single Institutional Review Board mandate-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

How U.S. research institutions are responding to the single Institutional Review Board mandate

Published:2018-08-09 Issue:6 Volume:25 Page:340-349
ISSN:0898-9621
Container-title:Accountability in Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Accountability in Research

Author:

Resnik David B.¹,Smith Elise M.¹,Shi Min¹

Affiliation:

1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

Funder

David B Resnik

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Education,General Medicine

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/08989621.2018.1506337

Reference14 articles.

1. Association of American Medical Colleges. AAMC statement on the release of common rule. Press release https://news.aamc.org/press-releases/article/01-19-17-common-rule/ (accessed January 19, 2017).

2. Center for Measuring University Performance. 2014. The Top 200 Institutions: Total Research Expenditures, Accessed, 2014. http://mup.umass.edu/sites/default/files/top200_totres.xlsx.

3. Single IRBs in Multisite Trials

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Articulating the social responsibilities of translational science;Humanities and Social Sciences Communications;2024-01-09

2. Pediatric specific challenges of the single institutional review board mandate;Trials;2022-03-21

3. The IRB Reliance Exchange (IREx): A national web-based platform for operationalizing single IRB review;Journal of Clinical and Translational Science;2022

4. Ethical and Regulatory Concerns in Pragmatic Clinical Trial Monitoring and Oversight;Ethics & Human Research;2020-09

5. Single IRBs Are Responsible to Ensure Consent Language Effectively Conveys the Local Context;The American Journal of Bioethics;2019-04-03