Taking it back: A pilot study of a rubric measuring retraction notice quality-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Taking it back: A pilot study of a rubric measuring retraction notice quality

Published:2024-06-25 Issue: Volume: Page:1-12
ISSN:0898-9621
Container-title:Accountability in Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Accountability in Research

Author:

Shi Alyssa¹,Bier Brooke¹,Price Carrigan¹,Schwartz Luke¹,Wainright Devan¹,Whithaus Audra¹,Abritis Alison²³,Oransky Ivan²⁴⁵,Angrist Misha¹⁶

Affiliation:

1. Duke University Initiative for Science & Society, Durham, NC, USA

2. Retraction Watch/Center for Scientific Integrity, New York, NY, USA

3. University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

4. Arthur Carter Journalism Institute, New York University, New York, NY, USA

5. The Transmitter, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, USA

6. Duke University Social Science Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA

Funder

no funding associated

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/08989621.2024.2366281

Reference34 articles.

1. Anonymous. 2015. “SPRINGER NATURE created following merger completion.” Accessed February 13 2023. https://www.springer.com/gp/about-springer/media/press-releases/corporate/springer-nature-created-following-merger-completion/256626.

2. Anonymous. n.d. “About Cochrane Reviews.” Cochrane Library. Accessed July 11 2023. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/about/about-cochrane-reviews.

3. Compliance of Retraction Notices for Retracted Articles on Mental Disorders with COPE Guidelines on Retraction;Balhara Y. P. S.;Current Science,2014

4. Guidelines for retracting articles

5. A Novel Rubric for Rating the Quality of Retraction Notices

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Retraction notices are getting clearer — but progress is slow;Nature;2024-07-26